I remember an Australian film I saw in high school. From that film I learned about Aboriginal legends, although the film was without subtitles, and I had only then started to learn English on my own. But the most interesting thing was that there were aborigines. Those people, which I had learned at school were a different race from all the others, they seemed to me the worst that our species can give. I was looking in shock at how unsightly these people could be, it seemed to me that all their features were as if made to be as repulsive as possible. On one of the characters, a young man who appeared shirtless at one point, I had declared him the ideal of human ugliness. For years we talked about him as someone very ugly, about where he was next to Chris. Then I had heard that the Australian aborigines were the most backward people in the world, but I never thought for a second in my life that intellectual ability was related to population, but I was sure that the beauty, and. Chris could be very smart, but he certainly couldn't be a model.
Since then time has passed, my interest in people from other populations became more and more professional. Although I stuck to the idea that beauty is racist (because it encompasses culture), I found out that unfortunately biochemistry is racist, that people have different diseases depending on the population they come from. But the picture of different populations began to change, and indeed changed a lot. In a popularization article I found information that, contrary to what it seems at first glance, Aboriginal Australians are more genetically related to South Asians than Africans (from black Africa, Of course, not from Libya). That's for sure, by the white inhabitants of South Asia. I felt like laughing when I saw this information. Does anyone doubt that. Let's see what it looked like, beyond skin color. Sure, native Australians are also called black Australians, because their skin is dark. But that's about it, their hair is straight or wavy, their features are totally different from those of sub-Saharan Africans. More, including the bones of the body appear very different from those of Africans. I mean if you put the body of a native Australian on a white person it is much more convincing than if you put it on an African. Contrary to what that article said, the way you look says a lot about your genes too. They look similar to the inhabitants of the Andaman Islands, culturally and especially linguistically interesting. The Andaman Islanders could also be said to be culturally primitive. They are probably descendants of an early migration to the area, like the Australians. Australia appears to have been colonized approx 60000 year old. Andaman Islanders, Australians, like the Papuans and other non-Asiatic inhabitants of Polynesia (following a late migration from south Asia inhabited by Mongoloids, especially southern China). In fact, the first inhabitants of the South Pacific archipelagos would have been similar to Australians.
My grandfather must have looked like Chris.
